train your ears

Commentaires

Fil des commentaires de ce billet

1. Elsa FONTAINE le 06 mars 2015, 22:05

In my mind, the online press is rather a good idea. In fact, when you read the news on your phone, you respect the earth. However, the screen of the phone is unhealthy because the blue light influences sleep patternrs if you read the news when you go sleep.

2. Rob le 07 mars 2015, 17:17

Elsa : I only agree up to a point. In fact, when you say "the online press is a good idea", i disagree with you... that's maybe true but you don't think to the persons who don't have internet or who don't know like the old people for example....

3. Rob le 07 mars 2015, 18:02

I think the printed press is more authentic. It never will be substitute by the online press.

4. Nicolas le 08 mars 2015, 20:20

Rob I share the same point of view about the fact that printed newspapers are more authentic. But the online press is easier to use. Indeed, you can read the news with all kind of device and it's not bulky.

5. Blandine le 11 mars 2015, 13:28

I would like to add that printed press can give more job than online. In fact, in internet or Tv, the information are subjective and nobody can say if it is really the good information. When we read an article in a newspapper, it have been worked, and i think the information is better here. Moreover, it is wright that online is esay and free. But On mi opinion, it is better to read a newspapper that to read information on internet or on Tv.

6. Laëticia le 11 mars 2015, 16:44

I think the printed press is more interesting. It is better for the nature. When you read news on your phone, you use of the battery of the electricity and it is bad for the Earth.

7. Laëticia le 11 mars 2015, 16:44

I think the printed press is more interesting. It is better for the nature. When you read news on your phone, you use of the battery of the electricity and it is bad for the Earth.

8. Adrien le 11 mars 2015, 17:50

To Laeticia: I can't agree with what you say. In fact, we know that some of deforestation is linked to the trade press...Bad for the Earth ? Personally I think that the online media has a direct impact on man and his social context rather than environmental impact. As said Blandine, online press diffuse sometimes false information, which is annoying.Finally, I think this is a new technique to access to the live information, free and unlimited.

9. Mathilde le 11 mars 2015, 17:59

I disagree with what Laeticia said. Printed press is not environmentally-friendly because it uses paper which comes from trees. However I agree up to a point: printed press is more interesting because all news are true, it creates jobs and we do not need internet. Indeed we can read it wherever and whenever we want.

10. Calista le 11 mars 2015, 18:21

Adrien globally I agree with you. As far as I’m concerned I believe that whether it is online or printed, free press is not very analytical and is shallow. When paid-for, the reporting is more in-depth. Very often online information is just the same article which has been cut and pasted from one site to another. Internet journalists do not take time to check facts as everybody expects information immediately. In the written press there is a little more time to investigate and gather information from different sources. I would like to add that, as regards deforestation, today newspapers come from managed forests which provide local employment. I read mainly internet articles from newspaper web sites because they are free and easy to access.

11. Irwin le 11 mars 2015, 18:24

As far as I am concerned, I think Adrien is right about online press not having a big impact on the environment. Indeed, as Mathilde said, the printed press requires more paper that online press does. I agree up to another point: printed press is more interesting because it's classic, verified and it creates a lot of jobs.

12. Clément le 11 mars 2015, 18:41

That's certainly true Laëticia but the online press is in live. In order to follow the live events, the online press is a better tool even if it requires having the battery on his phone like you said.

13. marine le 11 mars 2015, 19:07

Robin said that printed press is more authentic and don't need internet, and I totaly agree with him ! In fact some people can't go on the web for any reason so it is easier to read news for them in printed press than online, it's more accesible to all. And that is more athentic of course, in my mind I prefere hold the newspaper in my hands than a smartphone to read news
(Especially in the train)

14. Eva le 11 mars 2015, 20:24

Marine it is true that printed press is more authentic, however you said that you prefere hold a newspaper than a smartphone in the train and I can't agree with that. Indeed, when there is a lot of people in the train, hold a newspaper is not practical. So I think online press is better for its format.

15. Yann le 11 mars 2015, 20:49

Eva said that holding a newspaper is not practical, i agree with that however it is more authentic than a smartphone.

16. Lucas le 11 mars 2015, 20:57

To Eva: I agree with you to the fact that a newspaper is less convenient than a phone on the train. But as far as I am concerned, I think that, it takes more pleasure to reading the press of a real newspaper than reading on a small phone screen. The only real advantage of the online press is that it has a continuous information while has no newspaper. Furthermore, to access the online press, we need a permanent connection to the Internet, which is not the case for all.

17. jack Sparow le 11 mars 2015, 21:36

To Eva and Lucas:I shared with your point of view. In fact, I think the online newspapers this huge benefit that compensates for the fact of not having the pleasure of reading that we have with printed newspapers.

I concede that it is more expensive with the price of smartphones and that this requires an internet connection. But I think that people today prefer to pay more and have the information, classifieds, or even during the live awards. If the printed newspaper is still present, the online journal is essential with the expectations of our society.

18. jack Sparow le 11 mars 2015, 21:36

To Eva and Lucas:I shared with your point of view. In fact, I think the online newspapers this huge benefit that compensates for the fact of not having the pleasure of reading that we have with printed newspapers.

I concede that it is more expensive with the price of smartphones and that this requires an internet connection. But I think that people today prefer to pay more and have the information, classifieds, or even during the live awards. If the printed newspaper is still present, the online journal is essential with the expectations of our society.

19. Laurent 92i le 11 mars 2015, 23:13

To qualify all that I have been read on the previous comments, I would like to add that there is many bad side and benefit for the both press.
The both press pollute, online by need electricity and printed due to the paper that it involve. But the real question is What does not pollute today? Nothing ! The electricity needed for smartphones and other support for online press is negligible compare to the huge quality of paper needed in the printed press !The online news are on the spot and I disagree with Blandine on two point :- The online press is reliable as you chose reliable journal sites or application
- The printed press is not more worked than the online press, that the same people who write for the both press most of the time. The online press pollute less than the printed press and is accessible everywhere for everyone.
But I also think that printed press should continue to live, I mean it it is a real heritage and it is rather authentic.